Wikipedia:De kaffee/Arsjief060221
Datum-artikele "oontstumpe"
bewirkLeef lui,
Wiet geer woersjijnelek wèt zien väöl artikele op de Limbörgse Wikipedia nog kort. Op 't memint vaan sjrieve zien 1.591 artikele es "sjtumpke" aongemerk. Dat is neet zoe'n ramp, want laank neet allemaol zien ze extreem kort en de mieste beeje wel mie informatie en ei kort zinneke. Boe iech evels gere vaanaof wèl zien stumpkes vaan data. D'n datum steit op 't Veurblaad, en is aonklikbaar. Wee nui is op de Limbörgse Wikipedia, zal dèks d'n datum es ierste aonklikke. Es dat artikel daan mer oet e paar feitsjes besteit, is dat gein gooj reclaam.
Es iech good höb getèld zien momenteel 48 vaan de 366 datum-artikele nog stumpkes. Iech stèl veur tot we die veur 't ind vaan 't jaor allemaol wegwerke door ze oet te breie nao volweerdege artikele. V'r höbben 't geluk tot september compleet stumpkesvrij is en oktober ouch bekaans. Es v'r noe de sjouwers droonder zètte, hove die korte datum-lemmata noets mie vaanaof 't Veurblaad gelink te stoon! Steinbach (euverlègk) 15 sep 2018 10:50 (CEST)
- Mètdoen is neet verpliech. Mètpraote is wel gewuns. Steinbach (euverlègk) 1 okt 2018 00:16 (CEST)
- Hie haw ich bliekbaar euverhaer gekeke...
- Ich höb zelf neet d'n tied daoveur en de ieërlikheid gebèdj mich te zègke det ich jaor- en daagartikele neet zoea spannendj vinj (saai dus veur te sjrieve). Ich kan waal 'ns kieken of ich get kan oetbreie. --OosWesThoesBes (euverlègk) 1 okt 2018 12:41 (CEST)
- Jao, dat bin iech mèt diech ins. 't Is väöl routinewerk en 't mins sexy oonderwerp watste diech kins veurstèlle. Meh 't moot wel gebäöre (vin iech). Watste in eder geval kins doen (geer allemaol trouwens) is beveurbeeld: geboorte- en sterfdata touwveuge este 'n biografie aonmaaks, of vaanoet 't Nuits belaankrieke feite touwveuge. Steinbach (euverlègk) 1 okt 2018 12:56 (CEST)
- Det is inderdaad waal get veur innen achterkop te haje. --OosWesThoesBes (euverlègk) 2 okt 2018 11:20 (CEST)
- Jao, dat bin iech mèt diech ins. 't Is väöl routinewerk en 't mins sexy oonderwerp watste diech kins veurstèlle. Meh 't moot wel gebäöre (vin iech). Watste in eder geval kins doen (geer allemaol trouwens) is beveurbeeld: geboorte- en sterfdata touwveuge este 'n biografie aonmaaks, of vaanoet 't Nuits belaankrieke feite touwveuge. Steinbach (euverlègk) 1 okt 2018 12:56 (CEST)
The GFDL license on Commons
bewirkThis has been posted here because your wiki allows local file uploads. Help mit 't euverzètte nao dien spraok.
Commons will no longer allow uploads of photos, paintings, drawings, audio and video that use the GFDL license and no other license. This starts after 14 October. Textbooks, manuals and logos, diagrams and screenshots from GFDL software manuals that only use the GFDL license are still allowed. Files licensed with both GFDL and an accepted license like Creative Commons BY-SA are still allowed.
There is no time limit to move files from other projects to Commons. The licensing date is all that counts. It doesn't matter when the file was uploaded or created. Every wiki that allows local uploads should check if bots, scripts and templates that are used to move files to Commons need to be updated. Also update your local policy documentation if needed.
The decision to allow files that only have a GFDL license, or not allow them, is a decision all wikis can make for themselves. Your wiki can decide to continue allowing the files that Commons will no longer allow after 14 October. If your wiki decides to continue to allow files after 14 October that Commons will no longer allow those files should not be moved to Commons. — Alexis Jazz, distributed by Johan using MassMessage
20 sep 2018 20:11 (CEST)
Wikinuits
bewirkLeef lui, dit verdeent wel eus aondach en felicitaties. Nao mie es tien jaor is 't Ooswesthoesbes gelök um de Limbörgstaolege Wikinuits goodgekäörd te kriege! Dat wèlt zègke: 't is noe allein nog wachte tot de developers de site höbbe opgezat en daan besteit ze ech. Details dao-euver vint g'r hei-oonder. Veur zoe laank es 't doort vint geer de Wikinuits nog hei; binnekort zouw evels deze link mote goon wèrke. Steinbach (euverlègk) 1 okt 2018 00:16 (CEST)
- 't Haet inderdaad efkes gedoerdj, meh mitte kóms van 'ne nuje gebroeker höbbe v'r 't gesjaf :) --OosWesThoesBes (euverlègk) 1 okt 2018 12:44 (CEST)
- Ich haop det 't dees kieër ech get weurt mit dees Wikinuujs, mer of 't väöl kans maak ... ich wit 't neit, sorry. De Wikischim (euverlègk) 13 okt 2018 17:38 (CEST)
- Perfisia! Dit is hartstikke sjoen! Iech dink tot weldegelek kans heet op slage, want volges miech is Wikinuits al mie es 'n jaor up-to-date!--Zeiverklaos (euverlègk) 19 okt 2018 15:28 (CEST)
- E gans jaor nanneet, meh waal al vanaaf jannewarie :) --OosWesThoesBes (euverlègk) 19 okt 2018 16:36 (CEST)
- Perfisia! Dit is hartstikke sjoen! Iech dink tot weldegelek kans heet op slage, want volges miech is Wikinuits al mie es 'n jaor up-to-date!--Zeiverklaos (euverlègk) 19 okt 2018 15:28 (CEST)
- ...En det höbt geer kei good gedoan!!! Noe mer ein extra gleske beer naeme. . De Wikischim (euverlègk) 17 nov 2018 19:54 (CET)
Nui veurblaadartikel
bewirkDaag edereine, iech wèl ins 'ne kier vaan die Ribkwalle op 't Veurblaad aof. Die heet edereine noe wel gezeen. 't Artikel is beveurbeeld in augustus mer 156 kier bekeke, dewijl 't toch pontificaol veurop steit. Dus höb geer suggesties veur e nui, good artikel, 't leefste Limbörgs vaan oonderwerp? Steinbach (euverlègk) 1 okt 2018 00:16 (CEST)
- 't Zal waal lestig waere veur e Limbörgs óngerwerp te vinje (zeker es 't neet-taalkóndig mót zeen). Veur noe liek mich, tródsdet 't get roead is, Peerdesport 't bèste alternatief. --OosWesThoesBes (euverlègk) 1 okt 2018 12:47 (CEST)
- Aardeg idee, allein: 't is weer vaan miech... (En passant: Pahles, Stephan 0796, Zeiverklaos, wat tunks geer heivaan?) Steinbach (euverlègk) 3 okt 2018 17:13 (CEST)
- Iech bin akkoord. - Pahles | zègk 't mer 4 okt 2018 13:13 (CEST)
- Ich zouw geer wille wete, wat uur ónger good versjteet. Meint uur beivuurbild sjterartikele of lang artikele oane feëler? Missjien zint de artikele vakwerkhoes en Limburgse literatuur gouw alternatieve; die zint in jieëker geval waal Limburgs. --Stephan (euverlègk) 4 okt 2018 14:19 (CEST)
- Ich vinj "vakwerkhoes" waal e good alternatief. --OosWesThoesBes (euverlègk) 4 okt 2018 14:53 (CEST)
- Ich zouw geer wille wete, wat uur ónger good versjteet. Meint uur beivuurbild sjterartikele of lang artikele oane feëler? Missjien zint de artikele vakwerkhoes en Limburgse literatuur gouw alternatieve; die zint in jieëker geval waal Limburgs. --Stephan (euverlègk) 4 okt 2018 14:19 (CEST)
- Iech bin akkoord. - Pahles | zègk 't mer 4 okt 2018 13:13 (CEST)
- @Stephan: Dinkelek verstoon v'r neet allemaol perceis 'tzelfde oonder 'good'. Es 't zuver um kwaliteit geit, mooste idd aon Staarartikele dinke. Daan moot 'n artikel vrij laank zien (of beter: compleet; euverdreve laank id ouch neet de bedoeling), 't moot geinen twiefel geve euver de correkheid en 't leefste moot 't veurzeen zien vaan bronne. Veur miech hoof e Veurblaadartikel neet per se e Staarartikel te zien. Representatief moot 't evels wel zien: lezers mote zien wat veer in hoes höbbe en weure geprikkeld door wat ze zien. Veur dat lèste is 't sjiek um noe en daan e Limbörgs oonderwerp te höbbe, en zoewiezoe um regelmaoteg 't artikel te wissele en versjèllende dinger oonder de aondach te bringe.
- @edereine: 't Artikel vakwerkhoes vaan Aelske is prima. Iech gaon 't astrein op 't Veurblaad zètte! Steinbach (euverlègk) 4 okt 2018 16:29 (CEST)
- Danke, Steinbach! --Stephan (euverlègk) 5 okt 2018 19:08 (CEST)
- Aardeg idee, allein: 't is weer vaan miech... (En passant: Pahles, Stephan 0796, Zeiverklaos, wat tunks geer heivaan?) Steinbach (euverlègk) 3 okt 2018 17:13 (CEST)
The Community Wishlist Survey
bewirkThe Community Wishlist Survey. Help mit 't euverzètte nao dien spraok.
Hey everyone,
The Community Wishlist Survey is the process when the Wikimedia communities decide what the Wikimedia Foundation Community Tech should work on over the next year.
The Community Tech team is focused on tools for experienced Wikimedia editors. You can post technical proposals from now until 11 November. The communities will vote on the proposals between 16 November and 30 November. You can read more on the wishlist survey page.
/User:Johan (WMF)30 okt 2018 12:06 (CET)
Editing News #2—2018
bewirkRead this in another language • Subscription list for this multilingual newsletter
Did you know?
Since the last newsletter, the Editing Team has wrapped up most of their work on the 2017 wikitext editor and the visual diff tool. The team has begun investigating the needs of editors who use mobile devices. Their work board is available in Phabricator. Their current priorities are fixing bugs and improving mobile editing.
Recent changes
bewirk- The Editing team has published an initial report about mobile editing.
- The Editing team has begun a design study of visual editing on the mobile website. New editors have trouble doing basic tasks on a smartphone, such as adding links to Wikipedia articles. You can read the report.
- The Reading team is working on a separate mobile-based contributions project.
- The 2006 wikitext editor is no longer supported. If you used that toolbar, then you will no longer see any toolbar. You may choose another editing tool in your editing preferences, local gadgets, or beta features.
- The Editing team described the history and status of VisualEditor in this recorded public presentation (starting at 29 minutes, 30 seconds).
- The Language team released a new version of Content Translation (CX2) last month, on International Translation Day. It integrates the visual editor to support templates, tables, and images. It also produces better wikitext when the translated article is published. [1]
Let's work together
bewirk- The Editing team wants to improve visual editing on the mobile website. Please read their ideas and tell the team what you think would help editors who use the mobile site.
- The Community Wishlist Survey begins next week.
- If you aren't reading this in your preferred language, then please help us with translations! Subscribe to the Translators mailing list or contact us directly. We will notify you when the next issue is ready for translation. Danke!
2 nov 2018 15:17 (CET)
Change coming to how certain templates will appear on the mobile web
bewirkChange coming to how certain templates will appear on the mobile web
Help mit 't euverzètte nao dien spraok
Hello,
In a few weeks the Readers web team will be changing how some templates look on the mobile web site. We will make these templates more noticeable when viewing the article. We ask for your help in updating any templates that don't look correct.
What kind of templates? Specifically templates that notify readers and contributors about issues with the content of an article – the text and information in the article. Examples like Template:Unreferenced or Template:More citations needed. Right now these notifications are hidden behind a link under the title of an article. We will format templates like these (mostly those that use Template:Ambox or message box templates in general) to show a short summary under the page title. You can tap on the "Learn more" link to get more information.
For template editors we have some recommendations on how to make templates that are mobile-friendly and also further documentation on our work so far.
If you have questions about formatting templates for mobile, please leave a note on the project talk page or file a task in Phabricator and we will help you.
Danke!
Community Wishlist Survey vote
bewirkThe Community Wishlist Survey. Help mit 't euverzètte nao dien spraok.
Hey everyone,
The Community Wishlist Survey is the process when the Wikimedia communities decide what the Wikimedia Foundation Community Tech should work on over the next year.
The Community Tech team is focused on tools for experienced Wikimedia editors. The communities have now posted a long list of technical proposals. You can vote on the proposals from now until 30 November. You can read more on the wishlist survey page.
/User:Johan (WMF)22 nov 2018 19:13 (CET)
Advanced Search
bewirkNew Wikimedia password policy and requirements
bewirkHelp mit 't euverzètte nao dien spraok
The Wikimedia Foundation security team is implementing a new password policy and requirements. You can learn more about the project on MediaWiki.org.
These new requirements will apply to new accounts and privileged accounts. New accounts will be required to create a password with a minimum length of 8 characters. Privileged accounts will be prompted to update their password to one that is at least 10 characters in length.
These changes are planned to be in effect on December 13th. If you think your work or tools will be affected by this change, please let us know on the talk page.
Danke!
Invitation from Wiki Loves Love 2019
bewirkHelp mit 't euverzètte nao dien spraok
Love is an important subject for humanity and it is expressed in different cultures and regions in different ways across the world through different gestures, ceremonies, festivals and to document expression of this rich and beautiful emotion, we need your help so we can share and spread the depth of cultures that each region has, the best of how people of that region, celebrate love.
Wiki Loves Love (WLL) is an international photography competition of Wikimedia Commons with the subject love testimonials happening in the month of February.
The primary goal of the competition is to document love testimonials through human cultural diversity such as monuments, ceremonies, snapshot of tender gesture, and miscellaneous objects used as symbol of love; to illustrate articles in the worldwide free encyclopedia Wikipedia, and other Wikimedia Foundation (WMF) projects.
The theme of 2019 iteration is Celebrations, Festivals, Ceremonies and rituals of love.
Sign up your affiliate or individually at Participants page.
To know more about the contest, check out our Commons Page and FAQs
There are several prizes to grab. Hope to see you spreading love this February with Wiki Loves Love!
Kind regards,
Imagine... the sum of all love!
--MediaWiki message delivery (euverlègk) 27 dec 2018 11:13 (CET)
Zalig nuujjaor
bewirkLeef luuj, ich wins uch e zalig en vröchbaar nuujjaor. Det v'r weer väöl sjoean artikelkes kómme te sjrieve :) --OosWesThoesBes (euverlègk) 1 jan 2019 11:28 (CET)
- Vaan miech 'tzelfde! Steinbach (euverlègk) 1 jan 2019 22:44 (CET)
- 'ne Gouwe roetsj! :) --Stephan (euverlègk) 1 jan 2019 23:45 (CET)
FileExporter beta feature
bewirkA new beta feature will soon be released on all wikis: The FileExporter. It allows exports of files from a local wiki to Wikimedia Commons, including their file history and page history. Which files can be exported is defined by each wiki's community: Please check your wiki's configuration file if you want to use this feature.
The FileExporter has already been a beta feature on mediawiki.org, meta.wikimedia, deWP, faWP, arWP, koWP and on wikisource.org. After some functionality was added, it's now becoming a beta feature on all wikis. Deployment is planned for January 16. More information can be found on the project page.
As always, feedback is highly appreciated. If you want to test the FileExporter, please activate it in your user preferences. The best place for feedback is the central talk page. Thank you from Wikimedia Deutschland's Technical Wishes project.
No editing for 30 minutes on 17 January
bewirk16 jan 2019 19:47 (CET)
Talk to us about talking
bewirkThe Wikimedia Foundation is planning a global consultation about communication. The goal is to bring Wikimedians and wiki-minded people together to improve tools for communication.
We want all contributors to be able to talk to each other on the wikis, whatever their experience, their skills or their devices.
We are looking for input from as many different parts of the Wikimedia community as possible. It will come from multiple projects, in multiple languages, and with multiple perspectives.
We are currently planning the consultation. We need your help.
We need volunteers to help talk to their communities or user groups.
You can help by hosting a discussion at your wiki. Here's what to do:
- First, sign up your group here.
- Next, create a page (or a section on a Village pump, or an e-mail thread – whatever is natural for your group) to collect information from other people in your group. This is not a vote or decision-making discussion: we are just collecting feedback.
- Then ask people what they think about communication processes. We want to hear stories and other information about how people communicate with each other on and off wiki. Please consider asking these five questions:
- When you want to discuss a topic with your community, what tools work for you, and what problems block you?
- What about talk pages works for newcomers, and what blocks them?
- What do others struggle with in your community about talk pages?
- What do you wish you could do on talk pages, but can't due to the technical limitations?
- What are the important aspects of a "wiki discussion"?
- Finally, please go to Talk pages consultation 2019 on Mediawiki.org and report what you learned from your group. Please include links if the discussion is available to the public.
You can also help build the list of the many different ways people talk to each other.
Not all groups active on wikis or around wikis use the same way to discuss things: it can happen on wiki, on social networks, through external tools... Tell us how your group communicates.
You can read more about the overall process on mediawiki.org. If you have questions or ideas, you can leave feedback about the consultation process in the language you prefer.
Thank you! We're looking forward to talking with you.
New Wikipedia Library Accounts Available Now (March 2019)
bewirkHello Wikimedians!
The Wikipedia Library is announcing signups today for free, full-access, accounts to published research as part of our Publisher Donation Program. You can sign up for new accounts and research materials on the Library Card platform:
- Kinige – Primarily Indian-language ebooks - 10 books per month
- Gale – Times Digital Archive collection added (covering 1785-2013)
- JSTOR – New applications now being taken again
Many other partnerships with accounts available are listed on our partners page, including Baylor University Press, Taylor & Francis, Cairn, Annual Reviews and Bloomsbury. You can request new partnerships on our Suggestions page.
Do better research and help expand the use of high quality references across Wikipedia projects: sign up today!
--The Wikipedia Library Team 13 mrt 2019 18:40 (CET)
- You can host and coordinate signups for a Wikipedia Library branch in your own language. Please contact Ocaasi (WMF).
- This message was delivered via the Global Mass Message tool to The Wikipedia Library Global Delivery List.
Read-only mode for up to 30 minutes on 11 April
bewirk8 apr 2019 12:56 (CEST)
Wikimedia Foundation Medium-Term Plan feedback request
bewirkHelp mit 't euverzètte nao dien spraok
Reisbeurzen voor Wikimania
bewirkVan 14-18 augustus vindt in Stockholm Wikimania plaats, de jaarlijkse internationale bijeenkomst van de Wikimediagemeenschap. Actieve Wikimedianen kunnen bij Wikimedia Nederland een beurs aanvragen voor deelname aan Wikimania. Dit kunnen volledige beurzen zijn voor reis, entree én verblijf, of een beurs voor een deel van de kosten.
Net als vorig jaar zou Wikimedia Nederland graag naast ervaren Wikimania-bezoekers ook tenminste twee Wikimedianen willen steunen die nog nooit naar Wikimania zijn geweest. Wil je Wikimania (misschien voor het eerst) meemaken, dan kun je met dit formulier een beurs aanvragen. Aanvragen moeten voor 1 juni worden ingediend.
Zoals altijd: je hoeft geen lid te zijn van Wikimedia Nederland om voor een beurs in aanmerking te komen. Sandra Rientjes - Wikimedia Nederland (euverlègk) 16 mei 2019 13:03 (CEST)
Wikidata Bridge: edit Wikidata’s data from Wikipedia infoboxes
bewirkSorry for writing this message in English - feel free to help us translating it :)
Hello all,
Many language versions of Wikipedia use the content of Wikidata, the centralized knowledge base, to fill out the content of infoboxes. The data is stored in Wikidata and displayed, partially or completely, in the Wikipedia’s language, on the articles. This feature is used by many template editors, but brought several issues that were raised by communities in various places: not being able to edit the data directly from Wikipedia was one of them.
This is the reason why the Wikidata Bridge project started, with the goal of offering a way to Wikipedia editors to edit Wikidata’s data more easily. This will be achieved by an interface, connected to the infobox, that users can access directly from their local wiki.
The project is now at an early stage of development. A lot of user research has been done, and will continue to be done through the different phases of the project. The next steps of development will be achieved by the development team working at Wikimedia Deutschland, starting now until the end of 2019.
In order to make sure that we’re building a tool that is answering editors’ needs, we’re using agile methods in our development process. We don’t start with a fixed idea of the tool we want to deliver: we will build it together with the editors, based on feedback loops that we will regularly organize. The first version will not necessarily have all of the features you want, but it will keep evolving.
Here’s the planned timeline:
- From June to August, we will build the setup and technical groundwork.
- From September to November 2019, we will develop the first version of the feature and publish a test system so you can try it and give feedback.
- Later on, we will test the feature on a few projects, in collaboration with the communities.
- We will first focus on early adopters communities who already implemented a shortcut from their infoboxes to edit Wikidata (for example Russian, Catalan, Basque Wikipedias)
- but we also welcome also communities who volunteer to be part of the first test round.
- Then we will reach some of the big Wikipedias (French, German, English) in order to see if the project scales and to address their potentially different needs.
- Even later, we can consider enabling the feature on all the other projects.
In any case, no deployment or big change will be enforced on the projects without talking to the communities first, and helping the template builders to prepare for the changes they will have to do on the infoboxes’ code.
If you want to get involved, there are several ways to help:
- Read and help translating the documentation pages
- Follow the updates and participate in the first feedback loop
- Talk about it with your local community
More ideas will be added on this page along the way
If you have any questions for the development team, feel free to ask them on the main talk page. You can also ask under this message, but if you expect an answer from me, please make sure to ping me.
Thanks for your attention, Lea Lacroix (WMDE) 24 jun 2019 15:03 (CEST)
Editing News #1—July 2019
bewirkRead this in another language • Subscription list for this multilingual newsletter
Did you know?
Welcome back to the Editing newsletter.
Since the last newsletter, the team has released two new features for the mobile visual editor and has started developing three more. All of this work is part of the team's goal to make editing on mobile web simpler.
Before talking about the team's recent releases, we have a question for you:
Are you willing to try a new way to add and change links?
If you are interested, we would value your input! You can try this new link tool in the mobile visual editor on a separate wiki.
Follow these instructions and share your experience:
Recent releases
bewirkThe mobile visual editor is a simpler editing tool, for smartphones and tablets using the mobile site. The Editing team recently launched two new features to improve the mobile visual editor:
- Section editing
- The purpose is to help contributors focus on their edits.
- The team studied this with an A/B test. This test showed that contributors who could use section editing were 1% more likely to publish the edits they started than people with only full-page editing.
- Loading overlay
- The purpose is to smooth the transition between reading and editing.
Section editing and the new loading overlay are now available to everyone using the mobile visual editor.
New and active projects
bewirkThis is a list of our most active projects. Watch these pages to learn about project updates and to share your input on new designs, prototypes and research findings.
- Edit cards: This is a clearer way to add and edit links, citations, images, templates, etc. in articles. You can try this feature now. Go here to see how: 📲 Try Edit Cards.
- Mobile toolbar refresh: This project will learn if contributors are more successful when the editing tools are easier to recognize.
- Mobile visual editor availability: This A/B test asks: Are newer contributors more successful if they use the mobile visual editor? We are collaborating with 20 Wikipedias to answer this question.
- Usability improvements: This project will make the mobile visual editor easier to use. The goal is to let contributors stay focused on editing and to feel more confident in the editing tools.
Looking ahead
bewirk- Wikimania: Several members of the Editing Team will be attending Wikimania in August 2019. They will lead a session about mobile editing in the Community Growth space. Talk to the team about how editing can be improved.
- Talk Pages: In the coming months, the Editing Team will begin improving talk pages and communication on the wikis.
Learning more
bewirkThe VisualEditor on mobile is a good place to learn more about the projects we are working on. The team wants to talk with you about anything related to editing. If you have something to say or ask, please leave a message at Talk:VisualEditor on mobile.
23 jul 2019 20:32 (CEST)
Kandidaatstèlling sysop Ooswesthoesbes
bewirkBèste luuj, gelökkig is de noeadzaak veur admins allewiel väöl minder groeat es ieërehaer, mer ich mirk det vanne aaj garde nimmieë zoväöl euver is gebleve. Steinbach is d'n ènsigste dae nag regulier aktief is, en aventoe kump Pahles onnans ómmen hook kieke. 't Liek mich aevel wichtig det v'r teminste twieë regulier aktieve admins höbbe, moog 'ns 'ne gek veurbiekómme. Daoveur stèl ich mich bie deze kandidaat. Ich höb intösse, wietj g'r allich wètj, al väöl ervaring opgedaon door gans Wikimedia haer, dus ich weit woveur de knuupkes dene en wienieë me ze mót broeken en, veural, wienieë juus neet :) --OosWesThoesBes (euverlègk) 11 aug 2019 13:09 (CEST) @Gebroeker:Stephan 0796
- Veur
- --Stephan (euverlègk) 11 aug 2019 22:44 (CEST)
- Steinbach (euverlègk) 14 aug 2019 20:49 (CEST) Dit liek miech 'n formaliteit. Iech had m'ch entans al jaore trök veurgenome tot iech veur zouw stumme wienie dit verzeuk veurbij zouw koume.
- Taenge
- ...
Umtot iech demèt reken tot lui (Pahles?) op verkaantie zien, wach iech nog e paar daog. Es op de 25e nog geine ziech heitege heet oetgesproke, daon iech 't. Steinbach (euverlègk) 20 aug 2019 10:57 (CEST)
- @Steinbach: Ich stèl veur det v'r de stumming lankzemaan gaon sloete. Ich verwach nimmieër hieël väöl reaksjes. --OosWesThoesBes (euverlègk) 30 aug 2019 10:36 (CEST)
- Jao, 't weurt wel tied heh. Steinbach (euverlègk) 30 aug 2019 19:09 (CEST)
- Hahaha, danke :) --OosWesThoesBes (euverlègk) 31 aug 2019 11:10 (CEST)
- Jao, 't weurt wel tied heh. Steinbach (euverlègk) 30 aug 2019 19:09 (CEST)
Update on the consultation about office actions
bewirkHello all,
Last month, the Wikimedia Foundation's Trust & Safety team announced a future consultation about partial and/or temporary office actions. We want to let you know that the draft version of this consultation has now been posted on Meta.
This is a draft. It is not intended to be the consultation itself, which will be posted on Meta likely in early September. Please do not treat this draft as a consultation. Instead, we ask your assistance in forming the final language for the consultation.
For that end, we would like your input over the next couple of weeks about what questions the consultation should ask about partial and temporary Foundation office action bans and how it should be formatted. Please post it on the draft talk page. Our goal is to provide space for the community to discuss all the aspects of these office actions that need to be discussed, and we want to ensure with your feedback that the consultation is presented in the best way to encourage frank and constructive conversation.
Please visit the consultation draft on Meta-wiki and leave your comments on the draft’s talk page about what the consultation should look like and what questions it should ask.
Thank you for your input! -- The Trust & Safety team 16 aug 2019 10:03 (CEST)
New tools and IP masking
bewirkHey everyone,
The Wikimedia Foundation wants to work on two things that affect how we patrol changes and handle vandalism and harassment. We want to make the tools that are used to handle bad edits better. We also want to get better privacy for unregistered users so their IP addresses are no longer shown to everyone in the world. We would not hide IP addresses until we have better tools for patrolling.
We have an idea of what tools could be working better and how a more limited access to IP addresses would change things, but we need to hear from more wikis. You can read more about the project on Meta and post comments and feedback. Now is when we need to hear from you to be able to give you better tools to handle vandalism, spam and harassment.
You can post in your language if you can't write in English.
Johan (WMF)21 aug 2019 16:18 (CEST)
The consultation on partial and temporary Foundation bans just started
bewirkHello,
In a recent statement, the Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees requested that staff hold a consultation to "re-evaluat[e] or add community input to the two new office action policy tools (temporary and partial Foundation bans)".
Accordingly, the Foundation's Trust & Safety team invites all Wikimedians to join this consultation and give their feedback from 30 September to 30 October.
How can you help?
- Suggest how partial and temporary Foundation bans should be used, if they should (eg: On all projects, or only on a subset);
- Give ideas about how partial and temporary Foundation bans should ideally implemented, if they should be; and/or
- Propose changes to the existing Office Actions policy on partial and temporary bans.
We offer our thanks in advance for your contributions, and we hope to get as much input as possible from community members during this consultation!
Feedback wanted on Desktop Improvements project
bewirkHelp mit 't euverzètte nao dien spraok
Haj. The Readers Web team at the WMF will work on some improvements to the desktop interface over the next couple of years. The goal is to increase usability without removing any functionality. We have been inspired by changes made by volunteers, but that currently only exist as local gadgets and user scripts, prototypes, and volunteer-led skins. We would like to begin the process of bringing some of these changes into the default experience on all Wikimedia projects.
We are currently in the research stage of this project and are looking for ideas for improvements, as well as feedback on our current ideas and mockups. So far, we have performed interviews with community members at Wikimania. We have gathered lists of previous volunteer and WMF work in this area. We are examining possible technical approaches for such changes.
We would like individual feedback on the following:
- Identifying focus areas for the project we have not yet discovered
- Expanding the list of existing gadgets and user scripts that are related to providing a better desktop experience. If you can think of some of these from your wiki, please let us know
- Feedback on the ideas and mockups we have collected so far
We would also like to gather a list of wikis that would be interested in being test wikis for this project - these wikis would be the first to receive the updates once we’re ready to start building.
When giving feedback, please consider the following goals of the project:
- Make it easier for readers to focus on the content
- Provide easier access to everyday actions (e.g. search, language switching, editing)
- Put things in logical and useful places
- Increase consistency in the interface with other platforms - mobile web and the apps
- Eliminate clutter
- Plan for future growth
As well as the following constraints:
- Not touching the content - no work will be done in terms of styling templates or to the structure of page contents themselves
- Not removing any functionality - things might move around, but all navigational items and other functionality currently available by default will remain
- No drastic changes to the layout - we're taking an evolutionary approach to the changes and want the site to continue feeling familiar to readers and editors
Please give all feedback (in any language) at mw:Talk:Reading/Web/Desktop Improvements
After this round of feedback, we plan on building a prototype of suggested changes based on the feedback we receive. You’ll hear from us again asking for feedback on this prototype.
Danke! Quiddity (WMF) (talk)
16 okt 2019 09:18 (CEST)
Beta feature "Reference Previews"
bewirkA new beta feature will soon be deployed to your wiki: Reference Previews. As you might guess from the name, this feature gives you a preview of references in the article text. That means, you can look up a reference without jumping down to the bottom of the page.
Reference Previews have already been a beta feature on German and Arabic Wikipedia since April. Now they will become available on more wikis. Deployment is planned for October 24. More information can be found on the project page.
As always, feedback is highly appreciated. If you want to test Reference Previews, please activate the beta feature in your user preferences and let us know what you think. The best place for feedback is the central talk page. We hope the feature will serve you well in your work. Thank you from Wikimedia Deutschland's Technical Wishes project.
Editing News #2 – Mobile editing and talk pages
bewirkRead this in another language • Subscription list for this multilingual newsletter
Inside this newsletter, the Editing team talks about their work on the mobile visual editor, on the new talk pages project, and at Wikimania 2019.
Help
bewirkWhat talk page interactions do you remember? Is it a story about how someone helped you to learn something new? Is it a story about how someone helped you get involved in a group? Something else? Whatever your story is, we want to hear it!
Please tell us a story about how you used a talk page. Please share a link to a memorable discussion, or describe it on the talk page for this project. The team wants your examples. These examples will help everyone develop a shared understanding of what this project should support and encourage.
Talk pages project
bewirkThe Talk Pages Consultation was a global consultation to define better tools for wiki communication. From February through June 2019, more than 500 volunteers on 20 wikis, across 15 languages and multiple projects, came together with members of the Foundation to create a product direction for a set of discussion tools. The Phase 2 Report of the Talk Page Consultation was published in August. It summarizes the product direction the team has started to work on, which you can read more about here: Talk Page Project project page.
The team needs and wants your help at this early stage. They are starting to develop the first idea. Please add your name to the "Getting involved" section of the project page, if you would like to hear about opportunities to participate.
Mobile visual editor
bewirkThe Editing team is trying to make it simpler to edit on mobile devices. The team is changing the visual editor on mobile. If you have something to say about editing on a mobile device, please leave a message at Talk:VisualEditor on mobile.
- On 3 September, the Editing team released version 3 of Edit Cards. Anyone could use the new version in the mobile visual editor.
- There is an updated design on the Edit Card for adding and modifying links. There is also a new, combined workflow for editing a link's display text and target.
- Feedback: You can try the new Edit Cards by opening the mobile visual editor on a smartphone. Please post your feedback on the Edit cards talk page.
- In September, the Editing team updated the mobile visual editor's editing toolbar. Anyone could see these changes in the mobile visual editor.
- One toolbar: All of the editing tools are located in one toolbar. Previously, the toolbar changed when you clicked on different things.
- New navigation: The buttons for moving forward and backward in the edit flow have changed.
- Seamless switching: an improved workflow for switching between the visual and wikitext modes.
- Feedback: You can try the refreshed toolbar by opening the mobile VisualEditor on a smartphone. Please post your feedback on the Toolbar feedback talk page.
Wikimania
bewirkThe Editing Team attended Wikimania 2019 in Sweden. They led a session on the mobile visual editor and a session on the new talk pages project. They tested two new features in the mobile visual editor with contributors. You can read more about what the team did and learned in the team's report on Wikimania 2019.
Looking ahead
bewirk- Talk Pages Project: The team is thinking about the first set of proposed changes. The team will be working with a few communities to pilot those changes. The best way to stay informed is by adding your username to the list on the project page: Getting involved.
- Testing the mobile visual editor as the default: The Editing team plans to post results before the end of the calendar year. The best way to stay informed is by adding the project page to your watchlist: VisualEditor as mobile default project page.
- Measuring the impact of Edit Cards: This study asks whether the project helped editors add links and citations. The Editing team hopes to share results in November. The best way to stay informed is by adding the project page to your watchlist: Edit Cards project page.
– PPelberg (WMF) (talk) & Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk)
29 okt 2019 12:12 (CET)
Wikipedia Asian Month 2019
bewirkHelp mit 't euverzètte nao dien spraok
Wikipedia Asian Month is back! We wish you all the best of luck for the contest. The basic guidelines of the contest can be found on your local page of Wikipedia Asian Month. For more information, refer to our Meta page for organizers.
Looking forward to meet the next ambassadors for Wikipedia Asian Month 2019!
For additional support for organizing offline event, contact our international team on wiki or on email. We would appreciate the translation of this message in the local language by volunteer translators. Thank you!
Wikipedia Asian Month International Team.
MediaWiki message delivery (euverlègk) 31 okt 2019 17:57 (CET)
Extension of Wikipedia Asian Month contest
bewirkIn consideration of a week-long internet block in Iran, Wikipedia Asian Month 2019 contest has been extended for a week past November. The articles submitted till 7th December 2019, 23:59 UTC will be accepted by the fountain tools of the participating wikis.
Please help us translate and spread this message in your local language.
Wikipedia Asian Month International Team
--MediaWiki message delivery (euverlègk) 27 nov 2019 15:16 (CET)
Wie sorteerste 'nen Ieslander?
bewirkIech höb zoezjus 'n artikel gesjreve euver de briljanten Ieslandse cartoonis Hugleikur Dagsson. Es geer e bitteke vaan zwarten humor haajt: googelt häöm! Meh wat iech wouw vraoge: wie mote v'r zoe iemes sortere? Wie v'r wete höbbe ze in Iesland euver 't algemein gein echte achternaome, allein patronieme. Dagsson is dus gewoen de zoon vaan Dagur; zien eventueel kinder zouwe 'Hugleiksson' daan wel 'Hugleiksdóttir' hete. De veurnaom weurt in dee cultuur belaankrieker gevoonde. Mote v'r 'm oonder de H zètte, wie 'nen Ieslander zouw doen, of oonder de D, boe 'ne Limbörger häöm ieder zouw zeuke? Steinbach (euverlègk) 30 nov 2019 22:36 (CET)
- Ooswesthoesbes, Stephan 0796, Pahles en alle aandere: höb d'r hei 'n meining euver? Steinbach (euverlègk) 4 dec 2019 18:32 (CET)
- 't Liek mich dan praktischer um 'm gewoeën ónger de D te zette. De mieëtste Limburgesj wete waarsjienlig ganeet dat de lüj oet Iesland patronieme bezitte. --Stephan (euverlègk) 4 dec 2019 21:52 (CET)
- Mien hert es scandinavis geit oet nao de H, meh D is toch ech praktischer. 't Haet nammieë kulture wo v'r mit det probleem zitte. Höbbe de Sjineze neet ouch zoeaget? Veur 't sumpel te haje zów ich 'm sortere ónger de ieëste litter van 't waord waat 'ne gewuuene Limbörger es de achternaam zów betrachte :) --OosWesThoesBes (euverlègk) 5 dec 2019 09:41 (CET)
- Tot 't praktischer is, dao kinne v'r 't euver ins zien. Meh good, daan sortere v'r op 't patroniem. @Owtb: Chinese naome beginne mèt de familienaom. Veural vreuger woort die volgorde in westerse publicaties wel ins umgedrejd, wie dat ouch gebäört mèt Hongaarse naome. Bij die naome liek 't miech wel aongeweze um op de femilienaom te sortere; dat doen aander Wikipedia's ouch. Steinbach (euverlègk) 5 dec 2019 12:46 (CET)
- Den doon v'r 't zoea :) --OosWesThoesBes (euverlègk) 5 dec 2019 15:41 (CET)
- Miech liekent ouch tot sortere op de D 't mies praktisch is. Aander wiki's doen dat ouch (zelfs d'n Ingelse). - Pahles | zègk 't mer 7 dec 2019 10:01 (CET)
- Den doon v'r 't zoea :) --OosWesThoesBes (euverlègk) 5 dec 2019 15:41 (CET)
- Tot 't praktischer is, dao kinne v'r 't euver ins zien. Meh good, daan sortere v'r op 't patroniem. @Owtb: Chinese naome beginne mèt de familienaom. Veural vreuger woort die volgorde in westerse publicaties wel ins umgedrejd, wie dat ouch gebäört mèt Hongaarse naome. Bij die naome liek 't miech wel aongeweze um op de femilienaom te sortere; dat doen aander Wikipedia's ouch. Steinbach (euverlègk) 5 dec 2019 12:46 (CET)
- Mien hert es scandinavis geit oet nao de H, meh D is toch ech praktischer. 't Haet nammieë kulture wo v'r mit det probleem zitte. Höbbe de Sjineze neet ouch zoeaget? Veur 't sumpel te haje zów ich 'm sortere ónger de ieëste litter van 't waord waat 'ne gewuuene Limbörger es de achternaam zów betrachte :) --OosWesThoesBes (euverlègk) 5 dec 2019 09:41 (CET)
- 't Liek mich dan praktischer um 'm gewoeën ónger de D te zette. De mieëtste Limburgesj wete waarsjienlig ganeet dat de lüj oet Iesland patronieme bezitte. --Stephan (euverlègk) 4 dec 2019 21:52 (CET)
Wiki Loves Folklore
bewirkHello Folks,
Wiki Loves Love is back again in 2020 iteration as Wiki Loves Folklore from 1 February, 2020 - 29 February, 2020. Join us to celebrate the local cultural heritage of your region with the theme of folklore in the international photography contest at Wikimedia Commons. Images, videos and audios representing different forms of folk cultures and new forms of heritage that haven’t otherwise been documented so far are welcome submissions in Wiki Loves Folklore. Learn more about the contest at Meta-Wiki and Commons.
Kind regards,
Wiki Loves Folklore International Team
— Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk)
sent using MediaWiki message delivery (euverlègk) 18 jan 2020 07:14 (CET)
- Hee lui, dit is get veur us, en perceis op tied! Wee trèk de sjoenste foto's vaan de vastelaovend? Steinbach (euverlègk) 18 jan 2020 10:16 (CET)
- Iche neet, went ich doon noeatj mit :) --OosWesThoesBes (euverlègk) 18 jan 2020 20:11 (CET)
Movement Learning and Leadership Development Project
bewirkHello
The Wikimedia Foundation’s Community Development team is seeking to learn more about the way volunteers learn and develop into the many different roles that exist in the movement. Our goal is to build a movement informed framework that provides shared clarity and outlines accessible pathways on how to grow and develop skills within the movement. To this end, we are looking to speak with you, our community to learn about your journey as a Wikimedia volunteer. Whether you joined yesterday or have been here from the very start, we want to hear about the many ways volunteers join and contribute to our movement.
To learn more about the project, please visit the Meta page. If you are interested in participating in the project, please complete this simple Google form. Although we may not be able to speak to everyone who expresses interest, we encourage you to complete this short form if you are interested in participating!
Kint emes hie mesjiens dit sjabloon werkend make? Ich bèn zelf dao neit zo henjig in. De Wikischim (euverlègk) 4 fib 2020 23:58 (CET)
- Wiezoe, 't wèrk toch gewoen? De moos 't allein kinne touwpasse. Stèl, v'r höbbe nuits euver - iech neum mer get - de blokkaasj Wikipedia in Turkije, en op de Wikinuits gief 't 'n paasj "Törkieje ènjig blokkaasj Wikipedia". Este dit sjabloon wèls touwveuge op 'n paasj, daan völste beveurbeeld 't volgende in: {{Wikinuujs|Törkieje ènjig blokkaasj Wikipedia|de blokkaasj van Wikipedia in Turkije}}. Daan kump dao käöreg te stoon:
- Steinbach (euverlègk) 5 fib 2020 00:09 (CET)
- Ich zeen het noe, dank Steinbach. De Wikischim (euverlègk) 5 fib 2020 10:38 (CET)
- Kint noe ouch nl:Sjabloon:Wikinewscat nog veur hie gesjikt gemaak waere? De Wikischim (euverlègk) 5 fib 2020 11:02 (CET)
Hun es oonderwerp: maag dat in 't plat?
bewirkDat is fout, dat wete v'r allemaol, meh 't weurt wel gezag. Ouch in 't Limbörgs. Entans: in groete deile vaan Limbörg. Volgens 'n oonderzeuk zouw 't roond Swalmen hiel väöl weure gezag en in Eisde gaaroet neet. Wie daan ouch, iech höb 't Limbörgers vaan boete Mestreech wel ins hure zègke. En iech höb 't welins op de Limbörgse Wikipedia gezeen. In 't artikel snus, gesjreve in 't Baeks, stoont 't e paar kier, meh in 2011 höb iech dat gecorrigeerd. Noe is mien vraog: bin iech neet te streng gewees? Taol veraandert, dialekte zoe good wie cultuurtaole, en 't sjieke aon de Limbörgse Wikipedia is toch zjus totste de taol rech oet de volksmoond kins opsjrieve? Dus wat tunks uuch: mote v'r zoe'n constructies touwlaote of neet? Steinbach (euverlègk) 13 fib 2020 12:36 (CET)
- Ich bön dao taenge. Taal verangert inderdaad, meh van 'ne Limbörgse Wikipedia maag me gerös get mieë kwaliteit verwachte. Dao zeen luuj die eder verkleinwaord (of zelfs mieëvaad) oet 't Nederlandjs trèkke: Ich bön gistere nog met de kindjes nao de speeltuin gewaes, wo hun op de schommel hebbe gezaete etc. Veer passen ouch foute inne geslech enne adjectiefverbuginge aan, óndanks det e groeat deil vanne Limbörgers die regelkes gaar nimmieë wètj (smale jónges, 't maedje die, 'ne vrouw). Es se-n in eder verangering mitgeis, zeen v'r euver fieftig jaor d'n Hollenjer mit allein get regelmaesig klankverangeringe. --OosWesThoesBes (euverlègk) 13 fib 2020 19:21 (CET)
- Op de Nederlandjse WP wurt 't gesjreve gebroek van hun es óngerwerp al neit ens toegestaon. Den motte veer 't hie al hielemaol neit wille, toch? De Wikischim (euverlègk) 13 fib 2020 21:06 (CET)
- @Owtb: iech snap die punt en iech bin 't natuurlek ins tot v'r in principe batavismes boete de deur mote hawwe. Meh dit is wel aanders. Hun es oonderwerp kump al-evel oet 't weste, meh neet oet de standaardtaol. 't Is 'n taolveraandering die 'euver de groond' häöre weeg nao 't Limbörgs heet gevoonde, en neet 'vaanoet de loch' (parachuting). (Dat bliek wel oet wieväöl 't gezag weurt in Braobant en 't Riek vaan Nimwege.) 't Is dus gein sumpel 'oethaoling' vaan 't Limbörgs.
- @De Wikischim: Dien vergelieking geit wmb neet op. 't Nederlands, en naovenant ouch de Nederlandstaolege Wikipedia, hanteert 'n standaardtaol boe me ziech aon te hawwe heet. Es dee norm get verbeujt, is de discussie veurbij. Hei make v'r de norme zelf. Daan zalle v'r dus noe en daan mote discussiëre euver wie streng de norm (neet) is. Steinbach (euverlègk) 13 fib 2020 22:22 (CET)
- Det is waal van mieë verangeringe te zègke; döks beginne de verangeringen in 't naorden en zakke ze nao 't zuje aaf (wie 't ómboewe vanne adjectieve nao Braobantjs medèl, waat in Vinlo ieëre kwaam es wie 't noe in Remunj gebeurt). In det val liek mich 't 't bèste hun ummer te blieve waere, tenzij 't in 't lokaal(ste) waordebook steit. 't Zjwaams Waordebook zaet ziej en häör (objek), dus hun is fout. --OosWesThoesBes (euverlègk) 14 fib 2020 08:18 (CET)
- Hun es óngerwerp kumt dökker vuur. Beruch is natürlig 't Heëlesj Hollesj, mar 't versjiensel is óch durchgedrónge in 't plat van de Oeëstelige Miensjtreek. OWTB hat wat mich betruf rech: went 't toch neet in de woadbeuk sjteet, dan kins te beëter trükhaodend blieve. Me kan 't evvel waal besjrieve, mar es ich mich neet vergis hant v'r dat óch pas gedoa. --Stephan (euverlègk) 14 fib 2020 12:21 (CET)
- Det is waal van mieë verangeringe te zègke; döks beginne de verangeringen in 't naorden en zakke ze nao 't zuje aaf (wie 't ómboewe vanne adjectieve nao Braobantjs medèl, waat in Vinlo ieëre kwaam es wie 't noe in Remunj gebeurt). In det val liek mich 't 't bèste hun ummer te blieve waere, tenzij 't in 't lokaal(ste) waordebook steit. 't Zjwaams Waordebook zaet ziej en häör (objek), dus hun is fout. --OosWesThoesBes (euverlègk) 14 fib 2020 08:18 (CET)
Additional interface for edit conflicts on talk pages
bewirkSorry, for writing this text in English. If you could help to translate it, it would be appreciated.
You might know the new interface for edit conflicts (currently a beta feature). Now, Wikimedia Germany is designing an additional interface to solve edit conflicts on talk pages. This interface is shown to you when you write on a discussion page and another person writes a discussion post in the same line and saves it before you do. With this additional editing conflict interface you can adjust the order of the comments and edit your comment. We are inviting everyone to have a look at the planned feature. Let us know what you think on our central feedback page! -- For the Technical Wishes Team: Max Klemm (WMDE) 26 fib 2020 15:15 (CET)
Editing news 2020 #1 – Discussion tools
bewirkRead this in another language • Subscription list for this multilingual newsletter
The Editing team has been working on the talk pages project. The goal of the talk pages project is to help contributors communicate on wiki more easily. This project is the result of the Talk pages consultation 2019.
The team is building a new tool for replying to comments now. This early version can sign and indent comments automatically. Please test the new Reply tool.
- On 31 March 2020, the new reageren tool was offered as a Beta Feature editors at four Wikipedias: Arabic, Dutch, French, and Hungarian. If your community also wants early access to the new tool, contact User:Whatamidoing (WMF).
- The team is planning some upcoming changes. Please review the proposed design and share your thoughts on the talk page. The team will test features such as:
- an easy way to mention another editor ("pinging"),
- a rich-text visual editing option, and
- other features identified through user testing or recommended by editors.
To hear more about Editing Team updates, please add your name to the "Get involved" section of the project page. You can also watch these pages: the main project page, Updates, Replying, and User testing.
– PPelberg (WMF) (talk) & Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk)
8 apr 2020 21:24 (CEST)
Europees Parlemint: Fracties en partije
bewirkEs iech eve tied höb wil iech gaon beginne aon artikele euver de Europese fracties en partije binne 't Europees Parlemint, wie de Europese Volkspartij (EVP). Iech stèl veur tot veer de fracties en partije neet individueel artikele geve mer samesmelte tot gezameleke artikele. De EVP-partij en de EVP-fractie op ein artikel, dus beveurbeeld:
"De Europese Volkspartij is 'n partij en fractie binne 't Europees Parlemint".
Dat doen de meiste aander Wikipedia's neet. Hei twie reies boerum iech dao vaan wil aofwieke:
- In de media zoe-ouch in de algemeine polletieke discours binne de EU weure de fracties en partije dooreint gebruuk. Es beveurbeeld Politico of de NRC euver de EVP sjrijf, weurt noets e versjil gemaak tösse fractie en partij. Euver partije die 'nen aandere naom höbbe es de fractie (wie PES veur S&D) weurt überhaup neet väöl gesjreve. S&D weurt dèks (foutief) gezien es de sociaaldemocratische partij umtot die de inngeste is mèt polletiek beteikenis. 't Zien immers de fracties die polletieke invlooj höbbe binne de EU en zie mage ouch Eurocommissarisse oetkeze es zie in coaltie gaon mèt aander fractie um 'n Europese Kemissie te vörme.
- Dit is 'n kleine Wikipedia, 'n artikel veur edere fractie vin iech eigelek wel genog. Die Euro-partije zien eigelek veural belaangriek umtot ze deil oet make vaan fracties.
Es de partij en de fractie neet dezelfde naom höbbe kin iech 't zoe oplosse:
"De Progressieve Alliantie vaan Socialiste en Democrate (S&D; Nederlands: ..., Duits: ..., Frans: ..., Ingels:...) is 'n fractie binne 't Europees Parlemint. Bekans alle nationaal partije binne die fractie zien ouch deil vaan de Europese partij Partij vaan Europese Socialiste (PES), sommege nationaal partije zien evels oonaofhaankeleke partije binne de fractie gebleve. Toch höbbe ouch zie te make mèt 'n zekere maote vaan fractiediscipline."
Laot meh weite of g'r 't hei mèt ins zeet.
--Zeiverklaos (euverlègk) 24 apr 2020 10:59 (CEST)
- Ich höb mich noeatj zoea besjeftig mitte Europese politiek, dus ich kan hie neet zoväöl euver kwiet. Ich dink waal det v'r saortgelieke dinger waal dökker doon inne trant van "Wèssem (dörp)"/"Wèssem (gemeinte)" > "Wèssem". --OosWesThoesBes (euverlègk) 24 apr 2020 13:20 (CEST)
- Wat Owtb zeet. Iech bin ouch neet veur 't oetereintrèkke vaan dinger die in weze oongeveer 'tzelfde zien. De zouws toch vaan alles twie kier mote vertèlle, of gans kunsmaoteg oet 't ein artikel weglaote wat in 't aander weurt geneump en vice versa. Aojao, num wel in bedink tot 't Progressief Alliantie is, neet Progressieve. :) Steinbach (euverlègk) 24 apr 2020 16:30 (CEST)
- Fijn um te weite jonges!--Zeiverklaos (euverlègk) 27 apr 2020 15:53 (CEST)
Limbörgs veur "gokken"
bewirkLeef lui, iech mós heiaon dinke wie iech in 't Nuits get euver Macau touwveugde: wat zouw d'r in 't plat zègke tege 'gokken'? Iech höb gekoze veur speule, meh dat is natuurlek neet ummer dujelek: este nao Las Vegas geis "veur te speule" kin dat in theorie ouch in de plaotseleke zandbak zien. Of mesjiens biste wel 'ne muzikant dee dao in e hotel kump optrejje. En 't punt is: 'gokken' steit neet in de Nuie Mestreechsen Dictionair en stoont ouch neet in d'n online dictionair vaan 't AGL. Dus wat tunks uuch? Steinbach (euverlègk) 26 mei 2020 13:53 (CEST)
- "gokken" vèltj óngere groep "boevetaal"/"Begoons" en die zeen v'r ouch hieël riek in 't Limburgs. Zelf gebroek en huuer ich 't waord "gokke" geregeldj es ich plat kal en euvere päöl dörve ze waal "wèdde" zègke. Es se per se get anges wils zóds se "kans spele" kónne gebroeke, meh det is neet zoea algemein. --OosWesThoesBes (euverlègk) 26 mei 2020 14:27 (CEST)
- Aoh, merci. Wètste, in 't Hollands is gokken allaank gein Bargoens mie. Edereine gebruuk 't, zelfs in de beteikenis vaan 'denao raoje' (Ik doe maar een gok). Of dat in 't plat ouch zoe is, waor natuurlek de vraog. Wat wèdde betröf: is dat neet mer 'ne beperkde vörm vaan gokke? Gokke bij de peerdsrace is wèdde, roulette speule ouch, meh aon de loterij mètdoen of poker speule neet. Veur miech mooste veur 'wèdde' diech zelf 'n concrete optie oetzeuke boe 't loot op kin valle. Steinbach (euverlègk) 26 mei 2020 14:40 (CEST)
- "gokke" blief bie ós van aadshaer oet bepirk toet 't kansspeel, mer allewiel huuers se-n 't ónger invlood vanne standerdspraok netuurlik ouch es "raoje", en nag erger es "dinke"/"vermoeden" (via 't Nederlandjs vanoet 't Ingels "guess"), teenkrómmendj bieje jeug in 't zinke "Ich gok zoea"...
- @wèdde: Det is 'n gooj vraog. Pokere wuuert bie ós neet gedaon, allein toeppe en anger traditioneel kaartspele, en dan zègke v'r gewuuen "kaarte" of "kaarten óm geldj". Ouch 't gok-aspek bie laoterieje wuuert neet ech erkindj inne vouksmóndj, went den is 't gewuuen "mitdoon ane laoterie". "wèdde" wuuert waal gebroek veur spelen ane gokkas, en det is toch al 'n get breier beteikenis es 't standerd "wedden". --OosWesThoesBes (euverlègk) 26 mei 2020 15:12 (CEST)
- Aoh, merci. Wètste, in 't Hollands is gokken allaank gein Bargoens mie. Edereine gebruuk 't, zelfs in de beteikenis vaan 'denao raoje' (Ik doe maar een gok). Of dat in 't plat ouch zoe is, waor natuurlek de vraog. Wat wèdde betröf: is dat neet mer 'ne beperkde vörm vaan gokke? Gokke bij de peerdsrace is wèdde, roulette speule ouch, meh aon de loterij mètdoen of poker speule neet. Veur miech mooste veur 'wèdde' diech zelf 'n concrete optie oetzeuke boe 't loot op kin valle. Steinbach (euverlègk) 26 mei 2020 14:40 (CEST)
Editing news 2020 #2
bewirkRead this in another language • Subscription list for this multilingual newsletter
This issue of the Editing newsletter includes information the Talk pages project, an effort to help contributors communicate on wiki more easily.
- Reply tool: This is available as a Beta Feature at the four partner wikis (Arabic, Dutch, French, and Hungarian Wikipedias). The Beta Feature is called "Overleghulpmiddelen". The Beta Feature will get new features soon. The new features include writing comments in a new visual editing mode and pinging other users by typing
@
. You can test the new features on the Beta Cluster now. Some other wikis will have a chance to try the Beta Feature in the coming months. - New requirements for user signatures: Soon, users will not be able to save invalid custom signatures in Special:Preferences. This will reduce signature spoofing, prevent page corruption, and make new talk page tools more reliable. Most editors will not be affected.
- New discussion tool: The Editing team is beginning work on a simpler process for starting new discussions. You can see the initial design on the project page.
- Research on the use of talk pages: The Editing team worked with the Wikimedia research team to study how talk pages help editors improve articles. We learned that new editors who use talk pages make more edits to the main namespace than new editors who don't use talk pages.
17 jun 2020 22:33 (CEST)
Annual contest Wikipedia Pages Wanting Photos
bewirkThis is to invite you to join the Wikipedia Pages Wanting Photos (WPWP) campaign to help improve Wikipedia articles with photos and win prizes. The campaign starts today 1st July 2020 and closes 31st August 2020.
The campaign primarily aims at using images from Wikimedia Commons on Wikipedia articles that are lacking images. Participants will choose among Wikipedia pages without photo images, then add a suitable file from among the many thousands of photos in the Wikimedia Commons, especially those uploaded from thematic contests (Wiki Loves Africa, Wiki Loves Earth, Wiki Loves Folklore, etc.) over the years.
Please visit the campaign page to learn more about the WPWP Campaign.
With kind regards,
Thank you,
Deborah Schwartz Jacobs, Communities Liaison, On behalf of the Wikipedia Pages Wanting Photos Organizing Team - 1 jul 2020 10:24 (CEST)
feel free to translate this message to your local language when this helps your community
Feedback on movement names
bewirkHaj. Apologies if you are not reading this message in your native language. Help mit 't euverzètte nao dien spraok if necessary. Danke!
There are a lot of conversations happening about the future of our movement names. We hope that you are part of these discussions and that your community is represented.
Since 16 June, the Foundation Brand Team has been running a survey in 7 languages about 3 naming options. There are also community members sharing concerns about renaming in a Community Open Letter.
Our goal in this call for feedback is to hear from across the community, so we encourage you to participate in the survey, the open letter, or both. The survey will go through 7 July in all timezones. Input from the survey and discussions will be analyzed and published on Meta-Wiki.
Thanks for thinking about the future of the movement, --The Brand Project team, 2 jul 2020 21:44 (CEST)
Note: The survey is conducted via a third-party service, which may subject it to additional terms. For more information on privacy and data-handling, see the survey privacy statement.
Editing news 2020 #3
bewirkRead this in another language • Subscription list for this multilingual newsletter
Seven years ago this month, the Editing team offered the visual editor to most Wikipedia editors. Since then, editors have achieved many milestones:
- More than 50 million edits have been made using the visual editor on desktop.
- More than 2 million new articles have been created in the visual editor. More than 600,000 of these new articles were created during 2019.
- The visual editor is increasingly popular. The proportion of all edits made using the visual editor has increased every year since its introduction.
- In 2019, 35% of the edits by newcomers (logged-in editors with ≤99 edits) used the visual editor. This percentage has increased every year.
- Almost 5 million edits on the mobile site have been made with the visual editor. Most of these edits have been made since the Editing team started improving the mobile visual editor in 2018.
- On 17 November 2019, the first edit from outer space was made in the mobile visual editor. 🚀 👩🚀
- Editors have made more than 7 million edits in the 2017 wikitext editor, including starting 600,000 new articles in it. The 2017 wikitext editor is VisualEditor's built-in wikitext mode. You can enable it in your preferences.
9 jul 2020 14:55 (CEST)
Announcing a new wiki project! Welcome, Abstract Wikipedia
bewirkHi all,
It is my honor to introduce Abstract Wikipedia, a new project that has been unanimously approved by the Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees. Abstract Wikipedia proposes a new way to generate baseline encyclopedic content in a multilingual fashion, allowing more contributors and more readers to share more knowledge in more languages. It is an approach that aims to make cross-lingual cooperation easier on our projects, increase the sustainability of our movement through expanding access to participation, improve the user experience for readers of all languages, and innovate in free knowledge by connecting some of the strengths of our movement to create something new.
This is our first new project in over seven years. Abstract Wikipedia was submitted as a project proposal by Denny Vrandečić in May 2020 [1] after years of preparation and research, leading to a detailed plan and lively discussions in the Wikimedia communities. We know that the energy and the creativity of the community often runs up against language barriers, and information that is available in one language may not make it to other language Wikipedias. Abstract Wikipedia intends to look and feel like a Wikipedia, but build on the powerful, language-independent conceptual models of Wikidata, with the goal of letting volunteers create and maintain Wikipedia articles across our polyglot Wikimedia world.
The project will allow volunteers to assemble the fundamentals of an article using words and entities from Wikidata. Because Wikidata uses conceptual models that are meant to be universal across languages, it should be possible to use and extend these building blocks of knowledge to create models for articles that also have universal value. Using code, volunteers will be able to translate these abstract “articles” into their own languages. If successful, this could eventually allow everyone to read about any topic in Wikidata in their own language.
As you can imagine, this work will require a lot of software development, and a lot of cooperation among Wikimedians. In order to make this effort possible, Denny will join the Foundation as a staff member in July and lead this initiative. You may know Denny as the creator of Wikidata, a long-time community member, a former staff member at Wikimedia Deutschland, and a former Trustee at the Wikimedia Foundation [2]. We are very excited that Denny will bring his skills and expertise to work on this project alongside the Foundation’s product, technology, and community liaison teams.
It is important to acknowledge that this is an experimental project, and that every Wikipedia community has different needs. This project may offer some communities great advantages. Other communities may engage less. Every language Wikipedia community will be free to choose and moderate whether or how they would use content from this project.
We are excited that this new wiki-project has the possibility to advance knowledge equity through increased access to knowledge. It also invites us to consider and engage with critical questions about how and by whom knowledge is constructed. We look forward to working in cooperation with the communities to think through these important questions.
There is much to do as we begin designing a plan for Abstract Wikipedia in close collaboration with our communities. I encourage you to get involved by going to the project page and joining the new mailing list [3]. We recognize that Abstract Wikipedia is ambitious, but we also recognize its potential. We invite you all to join us on a new, unexplored path.
Yours,
Katherine Maher (Executive Director, Wikimedia Foundation)
Sent by m:User:Elitre (WMF) 9 jul 2020 22:06 (CEST) - m:Special:MyLanguage/Abstract Wikipedia/July 2020 announcement
The Universal Code of Conduct (UCoC): we want to hear from you.
bewirkHaj. Apologies that you may not be reading this message in your native language: translations of the following message may be available on Meta. Help mit 't euverzètte nao dien spraok. Danke!
At times, our contributor communities and projects have suffered from a lack of guidelines that can help us create an environment where free knowledge can be shared safely without fear. There has been talk about the need for a global set of conduct rules in different communities over time.
Recently, the Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees announced a Community Culture Statement, asking for new standards to address harassment and promote inclusivity across projects.
The universal code of conduct will be a binding minimum set of standards across all Wikimedia projects, and will apply to all of us, staff and volunteers alike, all around the globe. It is of great importance that we all participate in expressing our opinions and thoughts about UCoC and its values. We should think about what we want it to cover or include and what it shouldn’t include, and how it may create difficulties or help our groups.
This is the time to talk about it. Before starting drafting the code of conduct, we would like to hear from you and to solicit the opinions and feedback of your colleagues. In order for your voice to be heard, we encourage and invite you to read more about the universal code of conduct (UCoC) and then write down your opinions or feedback on the discussion page.
To reduce language barriers during the process, you are welcome to translate the universal code of conduct main page from English into your respective local language. You and your community may choose to provide your opinions/feedback using your local languages.
Thanks in advance for your attention and contributions, The Trust and Safety team at Wikimedia Foundation 22 jul 2020 18:42 (CEST)
Technical Wishes: FileExporter and FileImporter become default features on all Wikis
bewirkThe FileExporter and FileImporter will become a default features on all wikis until August 7, 2020. They are planned to help you to move files from your local wiki to Wikimedia Commons easier while keeping all original file information (Description, Source, Date, Author, View History) intact. Additionally, the move is documented in the files view history. How does it work?
Step 1: If you are an auto-confirmed user, you will see a link "Move file to Wikimedia Commons" on the local file page.
Step 2: When you click on this link, the FileImporter checks if the file can in fact be moved to Wikimedia Commons. These checks are performed based on the wiki's configuration file which is created and maintained by each local wiki community.
Step 3: If the file is compatible with Wikimedia Commons, you will be taken to an import page, at which you can update or add information regarding the file, such as the description. You can also add the 'Now Commons' template to the file on the local wiki by clicking the corresponding check box in the import form. Admins can delete the file from the local wiki by enabling the corresponding checkbox. By clicking on the 'Import' button at the end of the page, the file is imported to Wikimedia Commons.
If you want to know more about the FileImporter extension or the Technical Wishes Project, follow the links. --For the Technical Wishes Team:Important: maintenance operation on September 1st
bewirkRead this message in another language • Help mit 't euverzètte nao dien spraok
The Wikimedia Foundation will be testing its secondary data centre. This will make sure that Wikipedia and the other Wikimedia wikis can stay online even after a disaster. To make sure everything is working, the Wikimedia Technology department needs to do a planned test. This test will show if they can reliably switch from one data centre to the other. It requires many teams to prepare for the test and to be available to fix any unexpected problems.
They will switch all traffic to the secondary data centre on Tuesday, September 1st 2020.
Unfortunately, because of some limitations in MediaWiki, all editing must stop while the switch is made. We apologize for this disruption, and we are working to minimize it in the future.
You will be able to read, but not edit, all wikis for a short period of time.
- You will not be able to edit for up to an hour on Tuesday, September 1st. The test will start at 14:00 UTC (15:00 BST, 16:00 CEST, 10:00 EDT, 19:30 IST, 07:00 PDT, 23:00 JST, and in New Zealand at 02:00 NZST on Wednesday September 2).
- If you try to edit or save during these times, you will see an error message. We hope that no edits will be lost during these minutes, but we can't guarantee it. If you see the error message, then please wait until everything is back to normal. Then you should be able to save your edit. But, we recommend that you make a copy of your changes first, just in case.
Other effects:
- Background jobs will be slower and some may be dropped. Red links might not be updated as quickly as normal. If you create an article that is already linked somewhere else, the link will stay red longer than usual. Some long-running scripts will have to be stopped.
- There will be code freezes for the week of September 1st, 2020. Non-essential code deployments will not happen.
This project may be postponed if necessary. You can read the schedule at wikitech.wikimedia.org. Any changes will be announced in the schedule. There will be more notifications about this. Please share this information with your community.
New Wikipedia Library Collections Now Available (September 2020)
bewirk
Hello Wikimedians!
The Wikipedia Library is announcing new free, full-access, accounts to reliable sources as part of our research access program. You can sign up for new accounts and research materials on the Library Card platform:
- Al Manhal – Arabic journals and ebooks
- Ancestry.com – Genealogical and historical records
- RILM – Music encyclopedias
Many other partnerships are listed on our partners page, including Adam Matthew, EBSCO, Gale and JSTOR.
A significant portion of our collection now no longer requires individual applications to access! Read more in our recent blog post.
Do better research and help expand the use of high quality references across Wikipedia projects!
--The Wikipedia Library Team 3 sep 2020 11:49 (CEST)
- This message was delivered via the Global Mass Message tool to The Wikipedia Library Global Delivery List.
Kans om commentaar te leveren op Universele Gedragscode
bewirkTer informatie: een van de aanbevelingen in de Wikimedia Movement Strategy 2030 is het ontwikkelen van een universele gedragscode (Universal Code of Conduct): basisregels voor gedrag op Wikimediaprojecten en online platformen, en tijdens Wikimedia-evenementen en bijeenkomsten. Een redactiecommissie heeft nu een eerste concept ontwikkeld. De wereldwijde gemeenschap kan tot 8 oktober commentaar leveren en suggesties doen voor verandering of verbetering. Een Nederlandse vertaling van de concept gedragscode staat op Meta - daar is ook ruimte voor commentaar en discussie. Sandra Rientjes - Wikimedia Nederland (euverlègk) 10 sep 2020 13:33 (CEST)
Invitation to participate in the conversation
bewirkHaj. Apologies for cross-posting, and that you may not be reading this message in your native language: translations of the following announcement may be available on Meta. Help mit 't euverzètte nao dien spraok. Danke!
We are excited to share a draft of the Universal Code of Conduct, which the Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees called for earlier this year, for your review and feedback. The discussion will be open until October 6, 2020.
The UCoC Drafting Committee wants to learn which parts of the draft would present challenges for you or your work. What is missing from this draft? What do you like, and what could be improved?
Please join the conversation and share this invitation with others who may be interested to join, too.
To reduce language barriers during the process, you are welcomed to translate this message and the Universal Code of Conduct/Draft review. You and your community may choose to provide your opinions/feedback using your local languages.
To learn more about the UCoC project, see the Universal Code of Conduct page, and the FAQ, on Meta.
Thanks in advance for your attention and contributions, The Trust and Safety team at Wikimedia Foundation, 10 sep 2020 19:55 (CEST)"Greuninger Limbörgs"
bewirkDaag lui,
E paar weke trök wees eine op Euverlèk:Ènram trop tot veer e paar artikele in 't "Grunneger Limburgs" höbbe, gesjreve door iemes wat beweert 'ne Groninger vaan Limbörgse aofkoms te zien dee toes zoe praot. Noe zal iech de lèste zien veur häöm neet te gluive, meh mote v'r die artikele wel laote stoon? 't Bestoon vaan dit täölke steit neet vas, en v'r kinnen 't ouch noets aonpasse of oetbreie, want 't gief gein werke boe v'r us op kinne basere. Dit zouw bès ins de verkierden indrök kinne geve.
Mie veurstèl is daorum: die artikele euverzètte nao ech Limbörgs (dialek maak neet oet) en eventueel 't orzjineel op de euverlèkpaasj pläöre veur es eine oets nog get demèt wèlt (veur e wetensjappelek artikel of zoe). Wat tunks uuch? Steinbach (euverlègk) 21 sep 2020 20:46 (CEST)
- Det liek mich 'n gooj oplossing. --OosWesThoesBes (euverlègk) 22 sep 2020 07:32 (CEST)
- Gedoon. Steinbach (euverlègk) 22 sep 2020 15:55 (CEST)
Ètsberger
bewirkIn verband mèt 't bovestaonde kaom iech hei ouch weer op: Owtb, diech höbs zoe roond 2010 (of get iejer) 'n aontal artikele in 't "Ètsberger" aongemaak. Iech waor toen al sceptisch, en dat heet detouw geleid tot dien artikel euver dat dialek oet de hoofnaomruimte mós (geine mins kós 't jummers verifiëre). De waors t'rzelfdertied bezeg mèt 't 'Hoeglimbörgs' en aander kunsmaotege taolvörm die mer zoeväöl meugelek vaan 't Nederlands móste aofwieke. Hopelek snapste mien vraog: is dat "Ètsberger" wel ech 't levend dialek vaan 't gehuch Ètsberg? Steiste ouch noe nog achter de taol dieste dao höbs gebruuk? Steinbach (euverlègk) 22 sep 2020 15:03 (CEST)
- In graof liene klop 't. Mit betrèkking toet Categorie:Gesjreve in 't Ètsberger: Dao zitte waal get fuitjes in die ich in daen tied ouch doorveurdje veur 't Mofers/Remunjs (wie "sträöt" i.p.v. "straote"). Mit betrèkking toet Wikipedia:Opsjlaag/Ètsberger: dao zitte waal get apaartheje bie, mit naam inne IPA, die neet gans euvereinkómme mitte kinnis zowie ich die noe höb. Al mit al kan ich dao nag waal 'ns doorhaer gaon veur 't ein en anger rech te trèkke. --OosWesThoesBes (euverlègk) 22 sep 2020 15:10 (CEST)
- Aoh, dat is al 'n ganse oplöchting. Deranzjeer diech neet, dit kin wel eve wachte. Steinbach (euverlègk) 22 sep 2020 15:55 (CEST)
Wiki of functions naming contest
bewirkHelp mit 't euverzètte nao dien spraok
Haj. Please help pick a name for the new Wikimedia wiki project. This project will be a wiki where the community can work together on a library of functions. The community can create new functions, read about them, discuss them, and share them. Some of these functions will be used to help create language-independent Wikipedia articles that can be displayed in any language, as part of the Abstract Wikipedia project. But functions will also be usable in many other situations.
There will be two rounds of voting, each followed by legal review of candidates, with voting beginning on 29 September and 27 October. Our goal is to have a final project name selected on 8 December. If you would like to participate, then please learn more and vote now at meta-wiki. Danke! --Quiddity (WMF)29 sep 2020 23:22 (CEST)
Spreke v'r euver 't hof of de hof?
bewirkUmtot v'r op 't Mestreech spreke euver de Vriethof (in tegendeil tot 't Nederlands: het Vrijthof), vroog iech miech aof of 't zelfde touwpasselek is op 't woord hof.--Zeiverklaos (euverlègk) 7 okt 2020 15:06 (CEST)
- Inne meiste dialekten is det aafhenkelik vanne beteikenis. Zeker wen 't euver e gerich geit is "'t hof" 't gebroekelikste; wen 't euver get greun of 'n boerderie geit is "d'n hof" gebroekeliker, al meis mit 'n verlinging vanne klinker: "d'n haof"/"d'n hoof". --OosWesThoesBes (euverlègk) 7 okt 2020 19:19 (CEST)
- Aha, iech wis neet tot de Vriethof riffereerde nao 'nen hoof in plaots vaan 'n hof. Bedaank veur de oetlègk!--Zeiverklaos (euverlègk) 17 okt 2020 11:20 (CEST)
Call for feedback about Wikimedia Foundation Bylaws changes and Board candidate rubric
bewirkHaj. Apologies if you are not reading this message in your native language. Help mit 't euverzètte nao dien spraok.
Today the Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees starts two calls for feedback. One is about changes to the Bylaws mainly to increase the Board size from 10 to 16 members. The other one is about a trustee candidate rubric to introduce new, more effective ways to evaluate new Board candidates. The Board welcomes your comments through 26 October. For more details, check the full announcement.
Danke! Qgil-WMF (talk) 7 okt 2020 19:17 (CEST)
Important: maintenance operation on October 27
bewirkRead this message in another language • Help mit 't euverzètte nao dien spraok
The Wikimedia Foundation tests the switch between its first and secondary data centers. This will make sure that Wikipedia and the other Wikimedia wikis can stay online even after a disaster. To make sure everything is working, the Wikimedia Technology department needs to do a planned test. This test will show if they can reliably switch from one data centre to the other. It requires many teams to prepare for the test and to be available to fix any unexpected problems.
They will switch all traffic back to the primary data center on Tuesday, October 27 2020.
Unfortunately, because of some limitations in MediaWiki, all editing must stop while the switch is made. We apologize for this disruption, and we are working to minimize it in the future.
You will be able to read, but not edit, all wikis for a short period of time.
- You will not be able to edit for up to an hour on Tuesday, October 27. The test will start at 14:00 UTC (14:00 WET, 15:00 CET, 10:00 EDT, 19:30 IST, 07:00 PDT, 23:00 JST, and in New Zealand at 03:00 NZDT on Wednesday October 28).
- If you try to edit or save during these times, you will see an error message. We hope that no edits will be lost during these minutes, but we can't guarantee it. If you see the error message, then please wait until everything is back to normal. Then you should be able to save your edit. But, we recommend that you make a copy of your changes first, just in case.
Other effects:
- Background jobs will be slower and some may be dropped. Red links might not be updated as quickly as normal. If you create an article that is already linked somewhere else, the link will stay red longer than usual. Some long-running scripts will have to be stopped.
- There will be code freezes for the week of October 26, 2020. Non-essential code deployments will not happen.
Wiki of functions naming contest - Round 2
bewirkHaj. Reminder: Please help to choose the name for the new Wikimedia wiki project - the library of functions. The finalist vote starts today. The finalists for the name are: Wikicode, Wikicodex, Wikifunctions, Wikifusion, Wikilambda, Wikimedia Functions. If you would like to participate, then please learn more and vote now at Meta-wiki. Danke! --Quiddity (WMF)
5 nov 2020 23:10 (CET)
2021 enquête over de verlanglijst van de gemeenschap
bewirkDe 2021 enquête over de verlanglijst van de gemeenschap is nu geopend! De enquête is de manier waarmee gemeenschappen bepalen waar het Community Tech team volgend jaar aan moet gaan werken. We moedigen iedereen aan om voorstellen in te dienen voor de deadline op 30 november, of om te reageren op andere voorstellen om ze te helpen verbeteren. De gemeenschappen stemmen op de voorstellen tussen 8 december en 21 december.
Het Community Tech team is gefocussed op hulpmiddelen voor ervaren Wikimedia bewerkers. U kunt voorstellen in elke taal opstellen en wij vertalen deze. Bedankt en we kijken uit naar uw voorstellen!
Global bot policy proposal: invitation to a Meta discussion
bewirkHaj!
I apologize for sending a message in English. Help mit 't euverzètte nao dien spraok. According to the list, your wiki project currently is opted in to the global bot policy. Under this policy, bots that fix double redirects or maintain interwiki links are allowed to operate under a global bot flag that is assigned directly by the stewards.
As the Wikimedia projects developed, the need for the current global bot policy decreased, and in the past years, no bots were appointed via that policy. That is mainly given Wikidata were estabilished in 2013, and it is no longer necessary to have dozens of bots that maintain interwiki links.
A proposal was made at Meta-Wiki, which proposes that the stewards will be authorized to determine whether an uncontroversial task may be assigned a global bot flag. The stewards already assign permissions that are more impactful on many wikis, namely, global sysops and global renamers, and I do not think that trust should be an issue. The stewards will assign the permission only to time-proven bots that are already approved at a number of projects, like ListeriaBot.
By this message, I would like to invite you to comment in the global RFC, to voice your opinion about this matter.
Thank you for your time.
Best regards,
Martin Urbanec (Euverlèk) 24 nov 2020 12:49 (CET)
Wikidata descriptions changes to be included more often in Recent Changes and Watchlist
bewirkSorry for sending this message in English. Translations are available on this page. Feel free to translate it in more languages!
As you may know, you can include changes coming from Wikidata in your Watchlist and Recent Changes (in your preferences). Until now, this feature didn’t always include changes made on Wikidata descriptions due to the way Wikidata tracks the data used in a given article.
Starting on December 3rd, the Watchlist and Recent Changes will include changes on the descriptions of Wikidata Items that are used in the pages that you watch. This will only include descriptions in the language of your wiki to make sure that you’re only seeing changes that are relevant to your wiki.
This improvement was requested by many users from different projects. We hope that it can help you monitor the changes on Wikidata descriptions that affect your wiki and participate in the effort of improving the data quality on Wikidata for all Wikimedia wikis and beyond.
Note: if you didn’t use the Wikidata watchlist integration feature for a long time, feel free to give it another chance! The feature has been improved since the beginning and the content it displays is more precise and useful than at the beginning of the feature in 2015.
If you encounter any issue or want to provide feedback, feel free to use this Phabricator ticket. Thanks!
2020 Coolest Tool Award Ceremony on December 11th
bewirkHello all,
The ceremony of the 2020 Wikimedia Coolest Tool Award will take place virtually on Friday, December 11th, at 17:00 GMT. This award is highlighting tools that have been nominated by contributors to the Wikimedia projects, and the ceremony will be a nice moment to show appreciation to the tools developers and maybe discover new tools!
You will find more information here about the livestream and the discussions channels. Thanks for your attention, Lea Lacroix (WMDE) 7 dec 2020 11:55 (CET)
Onderzoek naar het Verlanglijstje van de Wikipedia-gemeenschap 2021
bewirkWe nodigen alle geregistreerde gebruikers uit om te stemmen op de 2021 Community Wishlist enquête. Je kunt vanaf nu tot aan 21 december stemmen voor zoveel verschillende wensen als u wilt.
In de enquête worden wensen voor nieuwe en verbeterde tools voor ervaren gebruikers verzameld. Na de stemming doen wij ons best om aan jouw wensen tegemoet te komen. We beginnen met de meest populaire.
Wij, het Community Tech-team, zijn een van de teams van de Wikimedia Foundation. We maken en verbeteren bewerkings- en moderatie-instrumenten voor wiki's. Waar we aan werken wordt besloten op basis van de resultaten van de Community Wishlist Enquête. Eenmaal per jaar kun je wensen indienen. Na twee weken kun je stemmen op de wensen die je het meest interesseren. Vervolgens kiezen we wensen uit de enquête om aan te werken. Een deel van de wensen kan worden ingewilligd door vrijwillige ontwikkelaars of andere teams.
We wachten in spanning op je stem. Dank je!
11 dec 2020 16:05 (CET)
AGL wöördebook
bewirkWenn ig hie in 'https://li.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wie_sjrief_ich_Limburgs#Versjillende_dialekte' op der link in 'Diksjenaere veur 't AGL zeen hie te vènje' duuj, kom ig iësj oet op http://www.limburghuis.nl en doa duuj ig dan op cgi-bin, 't enige waste doa kèns duuje. Mè dan krieg ig 't berich dat ig doa niks te zeuke hub: unne 403 forbidden. Allè noe, ig wil gèèr doa es inkieke wat ig allemoal euver de joare vergète hub; ig woon al vanaaf 1966 boete Limburg (allerwiel gans aan der angere kant van de wèreld) en hub 't neet vaak mië kenne sjprèke. Saluu, Ed.
- Daag Ed, watste zègks klop wel. De AGL-site is e paar jaor geleie opgeluf. Die dictionaire kinste hei nog vinde op Archive.org. Ech groet is dat AGL noets gewore en persoenelek vin iech dat jaomer, want veur sommege dinger höbbe v'r noe eine kier e neutraol Limbörgs nujeg.
- Natuurlek kinste op de Limbörgse Wikipedia, of örges aanders, in 't AGL sjrieve. Meh veur de mieste lui is toch gemekeleker es ze in hun eige dialek sjrieve. Mèt wat veur Limbörgs bis tiech opgetrokke? Groete kans tot 't dialek vaan dien plaots hei wel örges te vinden is. En aanders kinste väöl höbbe aon dit blaad. De kemissie is: good nao diech zelf luustere en opsjrieve watste huurs. In 't begin liekent dat allemaol gans ingewikkeld, meh nao korten leuste zoe dedoorheen. Compleminte, Steinbach (euverlègk) 13 dec 2020 13:12 (CET)
Ranzels
bewirkIch zou gaer i kontak komme mét de sjriever van 't sjtuk uuever 't Ranzels. Miene naam is Jules Jurgens, e-mailadres julesjurgens@gmail.com
- Det is Aelske (Els Diederen). Op dem zien gebroekerspagina kóns se kóntak mit 'm zeuke. --OosWesThoesBes (euverlègk) 29 dec 2020 20:06 (CET)
Perfisia allemaol!
bewirkLeef lui, Wikipedia besteit vaandaog twinteg jaor! (De Limbörgse versie nog neet natuurlek, daoveur mote v'r wachte tot 2024.) Veer es klein oonderdeilke vaan 't Wikimedia-febrik mage dao zjus zoe good gruuts op zien es de Ingelse, Duitse of Hollandse Wikipedia. Steinbach (euverlègk) 15 jan 2021 10:31 (CET)
- Perfisiat! :) --OosWesThoesBes (euverlègk) 15 jan 2021 14:42 (CET)
- Perfisiat! --Zjweëgelke (euverlègk) 17 jan 2021 11:32 (CET)
Moving Wikimania 2021 to a Virtual Event
bewirkHaj. Apologies if you are not reading this message in your native language. Help mit 't euverzètte nao dien spraok. Danke!
Wikimania will be a virtual event this year, and hosted by a wide group of community members. Whenever the next in-person large gathering is possible again, the ESEAP Core Organizing Team will be in charge of it. Stay tuned for more information about how you can get involved in the planning process and other aspects of the event. Please read the longer version of this announcement on wikimedia-l.
ESEAP Core Organizing Team, Wikimania Steering Committee, Wikimedia Foundation Events Team, 27 jan 2021 16:15 (CET)
Project Grant Open Call
bewirkThis is the announcement for the Project Grants program open call that started on January 11, with the submission deadline of February 10, 2021.
This first open call will be focussed on Community Organizing proposals. A second open call focused on research and software proposals is scheduled from February 15 with a submission deadline of March 16, 2021.
For the Round 1 open call, we invite you to propose grant applications that fall under community development and organizing (offline and online) categories. Project Grant funds are available to support individuals, groups, and organizations to implement new experiments and proven ideas, from organizing a better process on your wiki, coordinating a campaign or editathon series to providing other support for community building. We offer the following resources to help you plan your project and complete a grant proposal:
- Weekly proposals clinics via Zoom during the Open Call. Join us for #Upcoming_Proposal_Clinics|real-time discussions with Program Officers and select thematic experts and get live feedback about your Project Grants proposal. We’ll answer questions and help you make your proposal better. We also offer these support pages to help you build your proposal:
- Video tutorials for writing a strong application
- General planning page for Project Grants
- Program guidelines and criteria
Program officers are also available to offer individualized proposal support upon request. Contact us if you would like feedback or more information.
We are excited to see your grant ideas that will support our community and make an impact on the future of Wikimedia projects. Put your idea into motion, and submit your proposal by February 10, 2021!
Please feel free to get in touch with questions about getting started with your grant application, or about serving on the Project Grants Committee. Contact us at projectgrantsSjabloon:Atwikimedia.org. Please help us translate this message to your local language. MediaWiki message delivery (euverlègk) 28 jan 2021 09:01 (CET)