Euverlèk:Kirchröadsj: Versjèl tösje versies
Verwijderde inhoud Toegevoegde inhoud
Geen bewerkingssamenvatting |
|||
Tekslien 11:
:Ripuarian lacks proper government recognition in the Netherlands. In that regard it seems to be the same as Zeelandic and Brabantian, except that it is - wrongly - treated as "Limburgish". I know that there are bilingual signs in Kerkrade, just as there are in Maastricht - but that doesn't make the legal classification of the few Ripuarian dialects spoken in the extreme south of the province as "Limburgish" linguistically accurate. In fact, we really just have to refer to the situation with Serbo-Croatian in the former Yugoslavia to see that politics is the enemy of science when it comes to linguistics. Also, remember that Limburgish is also spoken in Belgium, where it has no government recognition - so why should that be a deciding factor on anything?
:Before you ask, yes, I can follow written Dutch and German to an extent, which makes reading Limburgish to be a relatively easy task. I can understand most (maybe not most, but a large portion of) what you've written. [[Gebroeker:Sol505000|Sol505000]] ([[Euverlèk gebroeker:Sol505000|euverlègk]]) 31 okt 2020 03:49 (CET)
::The definition of Limburgish linguistically is substantially different from the perceived definition by the people themselves. Kirkräödsj is accepted here as the people themselves consider it Limburgish, albeit an outlier. The same is true for the Brabantic dialects in Northern Limburg, and they are accepted here as well.
::So, the mean reason is what the speakers themselves think, as well as spelling (German-based spelling on ksh.wiki makes Kirkräödsj the outlier) and finding the wiki (people form Kirkraoj do find li.wiki, but they don't find ksh.wiki). --[[Gebroeker:Ooswesthoesbes|OosWesThoesBes]] ([[Euverlèk gebroeker:Ooswesthoesbes|euverlègk]]) 31 okt 2020 08:23 (CET)
== Verandering van de uitspraak van het Kerkraads? ==
| |||